Hm, would it require that a smart contract that has something like mapping address -> uint256 would have to store a current mapping value in the user’s account storage at some storage subtree or slot linked to this contract’s address?
↧
Hm, would it require that a smart contract that has something like mapping address -> uint256 would have to store a current mapping value in the user’s account storage at some storage subtree or slot linked to this contract’s address?